Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Karan Mutha vs.state

Karan Mutha vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 31, 2018
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1219042

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Karan Mutha

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....3066/2018 page 1 of 2 3. on 04.09.2018, an application was filed by the petitioner seeking exemption from personal appearance as he was suffering from fever. application was disallowed and nbws were issued and subsequently application seeking recall of nbws was rejected.4. 5.... petitioner was granted bail by this court by order dated 04.10.2018.... petitioner has been charged with offences under sections 3, 4, 9 and 55 of the gambling act which is punishable of imprisonment upto six months. it is informed that the co-accused had pleaded guilty and has been imposed fine only and no imprisonment has been awarded.6. learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on 02.11.2018 and shall appear as and when the matter is fixed and shall not absent himself without reasonable cause. the undertaking is accepted.7. in view of the undertaking and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order dated 04.10.2018 rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking cancellation of nbws by order dated 04.09.2018 issuing nbws are set aside. the nbws are accordingly recalled. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under the signatures of the court master.8. 9. october31 2018 ‘rs’ sanjeev sachdeva, j w.p. (crl.) 3066/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:

31. 10.2018 + W.P. (CRL.) 3066/2018 KARAN MUTHA ........ Petitioner

STATE versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Adv. along with petitioner in person. For the Respondent : Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

impugns order dated 04.10.2018 whereby application of the petitioner seeking cancellation of NBWs was dismissed and the petitioner was sent to judicial custody.

2.... Petitioner

is facing trial for offences under Sections 3, 4, 9 and 55 of the Gambling Act.... Petitioner

was granted bail by the Trial Court. However, petitioner failed to appear before the trial court on 04.09.2018, when the trial noticed that earlier also petitioner had failed to appear and NBWs were issued, however, the same were recalled subject to fine of Rs. 10,000/-. W.P. (CRL.) 3066/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. On 04.09.2018, an application was filed by the petitioner seeking exemption from personal appearance as he was suffering from fever. Application was disallowed and NBWs were issued and subsequently application seeking recall of NBWs was rejected.

4. 5.... Petitioner

was granted bail by this court by order dated 04.10.2018.... Petitioner

has been charged with offences under Sections 3, 4, 9 and 55 of the Gambling Act which is punishable of imprisonment upto six months. It is informed that the co-accused had pleaded guilty and has been imposed fine only and no imprisonment has been awarded.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on 02.11.2018 and shall appear as and when the matter is fixed and shall not absent himself without reasonable cause. The undertaking is accepted.

7. In view of the undertaking and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order dated 04.10.2018 rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking cancellation of NBWs by order dated 04.09.2018 issuing NBWs are set aside. The NBWs are accordingly recalled. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

8. 9. OCTOBER31 2018 ‘rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J W.P. (CRL.) 3066/2018 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial