Parveen Kumar vs.state

Parveen Kumar vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 31, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1219037

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1219037
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 31, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Parveen Kumar

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....he sustained injuries. bail appln. 2509/2018 page 1 of 2 3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. he submits that complainant was maltreating his wife, i.e. the sister of the petitioner and the subject complaint is a counter blast to her complaints. he submits that the nature of injury sustained was simple and complainant was discharged on the same day.4. learned addl. pp informs that the investigation is complete and the chargesheet is going to be filed. he submits that recovery of the danda which was used has been effected.5. without commenting of the merits of the case as also on examination of the record, i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.6. accordingly, petitioner is admitted to bail. he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs.15,000/- alongwith one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court, if not required in another case. the petitioner shall not do anything, which may either prejudice the trial or the prosecution witnesses.7. 8. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j october31 2018/‘rs’ bail appln. 2509/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

31. 10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2509/2018 PARVEEN KUMAR STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. Rahul Dev Tyagi and Mr. Ritesh Kain, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Shajudeen CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.343/2018 under Sections 323/341/380/5
of the IPC, Police Station New Ashok Nagar, New Delhi. Subsequently, Section 308 Indian Penal Code, 1860 has been added.

2. The allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that the complainant had a dispute with his wife. During quarrel, wife of the complainant called her mother and brother. They came to the house of the complainant and started beating the complainant with stick, on account of which he sustained injuries. BAIL APPLN. 2509/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that complainant was maltreating his wife, i.e. the sister of the petitioner and the subject complaint is a counter blast to her complaints. He submits that the nature of injury sustained was simple and complainant was discharged on the same day.

4. Learned Addl. PP informs that the investigation is complete and the chargesheet is going to be filed. He submits that recovery of the Danda which was used has been effected.

5. Without commenting of the merits of the case as also on examination of the record, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.

6. Accordingly, petitioner is admitted to bail. He is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- alongwith one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, if not required in another case. The petitioner shall not do anything, which may either prejudice the trial or the prosecution witnesses.

7. 8. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER31 2018/‘rs’ BAIL APPLN. 2509/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Parveen Kumar vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition