Pardeep Kumar & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct) & Ors

Pardeep Kumar & Ors vs State (Govt of Nct) & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 10, 2018

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1218621
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 10, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pardeep Kumar & Ors

Respondent

State (Govt of Nct) & Ors

Excerpt

.....the owners of the property.3. parties have settled their disputes. mou dated 14.05.2018 has been executed between the parties. respondent nos.2 and 4 had agreed to pay a total sum of rs.2.5 crores to the petitioners. the entire amount of rs.2.5 crores has been paid to the petitioners and the petitioners confirm that they have received the said amount and they have no right, title and interest left in the subject property.4. respondent nos. 2 to 4 are present in person and identified by the investigating officer. they submit that they have settled their disputes with the petitioners and do not wish to press the complaint any further and have no objection to the quashing of the subject fir.5. in view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent nos. 2 to 4 do not wish to press their complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating there from. crl.m.c. 4564/2018 page 2 of 3 6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.816/2016 under sections 448 ipc, police station dabri, south west and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are accordingly quashed.7. order dasti under the signatures of the court master. october10 2018 st sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 4564/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4564/2018 Judgment delivered on:10.10.2018 PARDEEP KUMAR & ORS versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) & ORS ........ Petitioner

s ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

s : Mr. Abhinav Tyagi with Mr. Chirag Mudgal, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS

: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. SI Davender, PS Dabri. JUDGMENT1010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl.M.A.31668/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4564/2018 1.... Petitioner

s seek quashing of FIR No.816/2016 under Sections 448 IPC, Police Station Dabri, South West. CRL.M.C. 4564/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the respondents that petitioners had encroached upon their property. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject dispute had emanated as the petitioners were claiming to be the bonafide purchasers of the property and the respondents complainants claimed to be the owners of the property.

3. Parties have settled their disputes. MOU dated 14.05.2018 has been executed between the parties. Respondent Nos.2 and 4 had agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.2.5 crores to the petitioners. The entire amount of Rs.2.5 crores has been paid to the petitioners and the petitioners confirm that they have received the said amount and they have no right, title and interest left in the subject property.

4. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are present in person and identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled their disputes with the petitioners and do not wish to press the complaint any further and have no objection to the quashing of the subject FIR.

5. In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent Nos. 2 to 4 do not wish to press their complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from. CRL.M.C. 4564/2018 Page 2 of 3 6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.816/2016 under Sections 448 IPC, Police Station Dabri, South West and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. OCTOBER10 2018 st SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 4564/2018 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Pardeep Kumar & Ors vs State (Govt of Nct) & Ors Same Subject Land Acquisition