Robin Raju vs.state

Robin Raju vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 26, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218217

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1218217
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Sep 26, 2018
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Robin Raju

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....their disputes before the motor accidents claim tribunal.... petitioner has agreed to pay a total sum of rs.4,25,000/- in full and final settlement of all the claims of the respondent nos.2 & 3 towards the injuries sustained as well as the motor expenses. the entire amount of rs.4,25,000/- has already been paid.4. respondent nos.2 & 3 are present in court in person, identified by the investigating officer. they confirm that they have received the settlement amount and have settled the disputes with the petitioner and do not wish to prosecute the fir any further and have no objection to the quashing of the fir and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.5. in view of the fact that the respondents have settled their disputes with the petitioner and do not wish to prosecute the complaint any further, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating there from. crl.m.c. 4930/2018 page 2 of 3 6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.376/2015 under sectionand 338 of ipc and sectionsof the motor vehicles act at police station tilak marg and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are, accordingly, quashed.7. order dasti under the signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j september26 2018 rk crl.m.c. 4930/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4930/2018 Judgment delivered on:

26. 09.2018 ROBIN RAJU STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr.Abhishek Gupta, Advocate. Mr.Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sunil Kumar, P.S.Tilak Marg. For the Respondent: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2609.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 32993/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4930/2018 1.... Petitioner

seeks quashing of FIR No.376/2015 under Section
of IPC. Chargesheet has been filed in addition under Section 338 and
of the Motor Vehicles Act at Police Station Tilak Marg. CRL.M.C. 4930/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to an accident that took place between the Santro car being driven by the petitioner and the motorcycle of respondent Nos.2 & 3.

3. It is contended that the parties have settled their disputes before the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal.... Petitioner

has agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.4,25,000/- in full and final settlement of all the claims of the respondent Nos.2 & 3 towards the injuries sustained as well as the motor expenses. The entire amount of Rs.4,25,000/- has already been paid.

4. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are present in Court in person, identified by the Investigating Officer. They confirm that they have received the settlement amount and have settled the disputes with the petitioner and do not wish to prosecute the FIR any further and have no objection to the quashing of the FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

5. In view of the fact that the respondents have settled their disputes with the petitioner and do not wish to prosecute the complaint any further, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from. CRL.M.C. 4930/2018 Page 2 of 3 6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.376/2015 under Section
and 338 of IPC and Sections
of the Motor Vehicles Act at Police Station Tilak Marg and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are, accordingly, quashed.

7. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SEPTEMBER26 2018 rk CRL.M.C. 4930/2018 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Robin Raju vs State Same Subject Criminal