Amit Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State (g.n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr.

Amit Kumar & Ors. vs The State (g.n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 27, 2018

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1217342

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1217342
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 27, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Kumar & Ors.

Respondent

The State (g.n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr.

Excerpt

.....the mediation centre, dwarka courts, delhi.4. as per the settlement, a total amount of rs. 3,00,000/-is to be paid to respondent no.2. a sum of rs. 2 lacs have already been paid. rs. one lakh is being paid today in court by way of demand draft no.413359 dated 23rd july, 2018 drawn on oriental bank of commerce.5. respondent no.2 is present in court in person represented by counsel and identified by the investigating officer. she submits that she has settled her disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.6. in view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discard and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 12th march, 2018, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case crl.m.c. 4317/2018 page 2 of 3 demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.7. in view of the above, fir no.100/2016 under sections 498a/4ipc, registered at police station, dabri and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.8. order dasti under the signatures of the court master. august27 2018 p sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 4317/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

27. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4317/2018 AMIT KUMAR & ORS. ....... Petitioner

s versus THE STATE (G.N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. Binod Kumar Jha with Mr. Shashi Kumar Shukla, Advocates For the... Petitioner

s : For the... RESPONDENTS

: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar and Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocates for the Complainant. ASI Ramphal Singh, PS Dabri JUDGMENT2708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30754/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4317/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.100/2016 under CRL.M.C. 4317/2018 Page 1 of 3 Sections 498A/4
IPC, registered at Police Station, Dabri.

2. 3. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute before the Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi.

4. As per the settlement, a total amount of Rs. 3,00,000/-is to be paid to respondent No.2. A sum of Rs. 2 lacs have already been paid. Rs. One lakh is being paid today in Court by way of Demand Draft No.413359 dated 23rd July, 2018 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce.

5. Respondent No.2 is present in Court in person represented by counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled her disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.

6. In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discard and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 12th March, 2018, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case CRL.M.C. 4317/2018 Page 2 of 3 demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

7. In view of the above, FIR No.100/2016 under Sections 498A/4
IPC, registered at Police Station, Dabri and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST27 2018 P SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 4317/2018 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Amit Kumar & Ors. vs The State (g.n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition