Satender Tomar & Ors. Vs.state of Nct & Anr.

Satender Tomar & Ors. vs State of Nct & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 23, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1217233

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1217233
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 23, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satender Tomar & Ors.

Respondent

State of Nct & Anr.

Excerpt

.....account of some financial disputes a quarrel took place which led to the incident consequent to which the subject fir has been registered.3. parties have settled their disputes not only with regard to the subject fir but also with regard to the partnership concern. compromise deed crl.m.c. 4238/2018 page 1 of 2 dated 17.04.2018 has been executed.4. respondent no.2/complainant present in court in person is identified by the investigating officer. he submits that he has settled the disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.357/2014 under sections 308/325/5ipc at police station vasant vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed, subject to the payment of cost of rs.5,000/- to be deposited by each of the petitioners in the chief minister disaster relief fund of the state of kerala within a period of two weeks from today. receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this order be furnished to the concerned investigating officer within a period of three weeks from today.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. august23 2018/rk crl.m.c. 4238/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4238/2018 & Crl.M.A.30480/2018 Judgment delivered on:23.08.2018 SATENDER TOMAR & ORS STATE OF NCT & ANR versus ........ Petitioner

s ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Rahul Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ranveer Singh, P.S. Vasant Vihar CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

s seek quashing of FIR No.357/2014 under Sections 325/5
IPC at Police Station Vasant Vihar. Subsequently, chargesheet has been filed under Section 308 IPC.

2. The parties were partners in a partnership firm. On account of some financial disputes a quarrel took place which led to the incident consequent to which the subject FIR has been registered.

3. Parties have settled their disputes not only with regard to the subject FIR but also with regard to the partnership concern. Compromise Deed CRL.M.C. 4238/2018 Page 1 of 2 dated 17.04.2018 has been executed.

4. Respondent No.2/complainant present in court in person is identified by the Investigating Officer. He submits that he has settled the disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.357/2014 under Sections 308/325/5
IPC at Police Station Vasant Vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed, subject to the payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited by each of the petitioners in the Chief Minister Disaster Relief Fund of the State of Kerala within a period of two weeks from today. Receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this Order be furnished to the concerned Investigating Officer within a period of three weeks from today.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST23 2018/rk CRL.M.C. 4238/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Satender Tomar & Ors. vs State of Nct & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition