Priya & Ors. Vs.state ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Priya & Ors. vs State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 02, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216694

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1216694
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 02, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Priya & Ors.

Respondent

State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Excerpt

.....to each other. subject fir was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties over family properties.3. learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of other members of the crl.m.c. 3857/2018 page 1 of 2 family. memorandum of understanding dated 06.06.2018 has been executed.4. respondent no.2 is present in court in person, represented by his counsel and identified by the investigating officer. he submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners and does not wish to press the complaint against them any further.... petitioner nos.4 & 5 are minors and represented through their father, petitioner no.2 as their natural guardian.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent no.2 have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.336/2016 under sections 323/341/506 ipc at police station ranjit nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. august02 2018/rk crl.m.c. 3857/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3857/2018 Judgment delivered on:02.08.2018 PRIYA & ORS ........ Petitioner

s STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Girik Tolani, Adv Mr. Raghuvender Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Pooja, P.S.Ranjit Nagar. Ms.Mumtaz, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) CM Appl.29135/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3857/2018 1.... Petitioner

s seek quashing of FIR No.336/2016 under Sections 323/341/506 IPC at Police Station Ranjit Nagar.

2. The parties are related to each other. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties over family properties.

3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of other members of the CRL.M.C. 3857/2018 Page 1 of 2 family. Memorandum of Understanding dated 06.06.2018 has been executed.

4. Respondent No.2 is present in court in person, represented by his counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. He submits that he has settled the dispute with the petitioners and does not wish to press the complaint against them any further.... Petitioner

Nos.4 & 5 are minors and represented through their father, petitioner No.2 as their natural guardian.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.2 have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.336/2016 under Sections 323/341/506 IPC at Police Station Ranjit Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST02 2018/rk CRL.M.C. 3857/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Priya & Ors. vs State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition