Sanjeev Sood vs.state & Anr.

Sanjeev Sood vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 01, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1216636
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 01, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjeev Sood

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

.....sections 451/380/323/5of the ipc at police station nabi karim.2. the parties were tenants in the same property though in different portions.3. the subject fir was registered against the petitioner as well as other co-accused. learned counsels for the parties submit that the crl.m.c. 3811/2018 page 1 of 2 parties have settled their disputes. by order dated 28.05.2018 in crl.m.c.2984/2018 titled ashok sahni vs. state (nct of delhi) & anr, subject fir has been quashed against the petitioner therein based on the settlement.4. respondent no.2 who is present in court in person and identified by the investigating officer submits that he does not wish to press the complaint any further as he has settled with the petitioner.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent no.2 have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.282/2007 under sections 451/380/323/5of the ipc at police station nabi karim and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. august01 2018/rk crl.m.c. 3811/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3811/2018 SANJEEV SOOD STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioner

........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Nitin Kashyap, Adv Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ramavtar, P.S.Nabi Karim. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 29014/2018 (Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3811/2018 1.... Petitioner

seeks quashing of FIR No.282/2007 under Sections 451/380/323/5
of the IPC at Police Station Nabi Karim.

2. The parties were tenants in the same property though in different portions.

3. The subject FIR was registered against the petitioner as well as other co-accused. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the CRL.M.C. 3811/2018 Page 1 of 2 parties have settled their disputes. By order dated 28.05.2018 in Crl.M.C.2984/2018 titled Ashok Sahni vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & ANR, subject FIR has been quashed against the petitioner therein based on the settlement.

4. Respondent No.2 who is present in court in person and identified by the Investigating Officer submits that he does not wish to press the complaint any further as he has settled with the petitioner.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.2 have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.282/2007 under Sections 451/380/323/5
of the IPC at Police Station Nabi Karim and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST01 2018/rk CRL.M.C. 3811/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Sanjeev Sood vs State & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition