Ramu Jaiswal @ Ambriszh vs.state

Ramu Jaiswal @ Ambriszh vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 01, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216632

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1216632
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 01, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramu Jaiswal @ Ambriszh

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....1. the petitioner seeks interim bail in case fir no.18/2014 under sections 21-c/29/of the ndps act read with sections 419/468/471/474 of the ipc, police station special cell, new delhi.2. the ground taken by the petitioner is that the petitioner intends to dispose of some agricultural land situated at district faridpur, bareilly u.p. for the purpose of making financial arrangements for his family.3. status report has been filed which verifies the fact that the petitioner bail appln. 1232/2018 page 1 of 2 has agreed to sell 3 bighas of land and the prospective purchaser has already given an advance at the time of sale agreement and remaining payment is to be made at the time of execution of documents.4. learned addl. pp opposes the application by submitting that earlier also the petitioner had obtained interim bail on similar ground, however, no such sale document were executed. she further submits that the petitioner is involved in five similar cases out of which three cases are still pending.5. in view of the fact that petitioner has already finalised the deal and only sale documents have to be executed and payment received, i am of the view that the petitioner can be taken in custody for the purpose of executing the sale document.6. accordingly, it is directed that at the time when the petitioner has to execute sale document, the jail authorities shall make necessary arrangements for taking the petitioner to the office of the concerned tehsildar/sub-registrar for the purpose of executing sale documents in police custody.7. 8. the petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master. order be communicated to the jail superintendent also. sanjeev sachdeva, j august01 2018/‘rs’ bail appln. 1232/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

01. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1232/2018 RAMU JAISWAL @ AMBRISZH STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent : Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Sourabh Luthra, Advs. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks interim bail in case FIR No.18/2014 under Sections 21-C/29/
of the NDPS Act read with Sections 419/468/471/474 of the IPC, Police Station Special Cell, New Delhi.

2. The ground taken by the petitioner is that the petitioner intends to dispose of some agricultural land situated at District Faridpur, Bareilly U.P. for the purpose of making financial arrangements for his family.

3. Status report has been filed which verifies the fact that the petitioner BAIL APPLN. 1232/2018 Page 1 of 2 has agreed to sell 3 bighas of land and the prospective purchaser has already given an advance at the time of sale agreement and remaining payment is to be made at the time of execution of documents.

4. Learned Addl. PP opposes the application by submitting that earlier also the petitioner had obtained interim bail on similar ground, however, no such sale document were executed. She further submits that the petitioner is involved in five similar cases out of which three cases are still pending.

5. In view of the fact that petitioner has already finalised the deal and only sale documents have to be executed and payment received, I am of the view that the petitioner can be taken in custody for the purpose of executing the sale document.

6. Accordingly, it is directed that at the time when the petitioner has to execute sale document, the jail authorities shall make necessary arrangements for taking the petitioner to the office of the concerned Tehsildar/Sub-Registrar for the purpose of executing sale documents in police custody.

7. 8. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. Order be communicated to the Jail Superintendent also. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST01 2018/‘rs’ BAIL APPLN. 1232/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Ramu Jaiswal @ Ambriszh vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition