Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhola & Ors. Vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Bhola & Ors. vs The State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 25, 2018
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216413

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhola & Ors.

Respondent

The State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Excerpt

.....had also brought their handcart and started selling fruits next to the complainant on account of which an altercation took place. crl.m.c. 3310/2018 page 1 of 2 3. learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of friends and other respectable persons of the village and compromise deed dated 11.05.2018 has been executed.4. complainants are present in court in person and identified by the investigating officer. they submit that they have settled the dispute with the petitioners and do not wish to press the complaint against them any further. both parties assure that they shall maintain cordial relations and shall not quarrel with each other.5. in view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and complainants have been settled and they do not want to prosecute the complaint any further, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject fir and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.6. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.196/2018 under sections 3at police station shakar pur and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.7. order dasti under signatures of the court master. july25 2018/ns crl.m.c. 3310/2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

25. 07.2018 CRL.M.C. 3310/2018 BHOLA & ORS ........ Petitioner

s versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr. S. Hasan Zaidi, Adv. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Arvind, PS Shakar Pur CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2507.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

s seek quashing of FIR No.196/2018 under Sections 3
at Police Station Shakar Pur.

2. The parties are related to each other and also belong to the same village. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties with regard to selling of fruits on a hand cart. It is alleged that complainant vends fruits etc. from a handcart and the petitioners/accused had also brought their handcart and started selling fruits next to the complainant on account of which an altercation took place. CRL.M.C. 3310/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of friends and other respectable persons of the village and compromise deed dated 11.05.2018 has been executed.

4. Complainants are present in court in person and identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled the dispute with the petitioners and do not wish to press the complaint against them any further. Both parties assure that they shall maintain cordial relations and shall not quarrel with each other.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and complainants have been settled and they do not want to prosecute the complaint any further, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.196/2018 under Sections 3
at Police Station Shakar Pur and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. JULY25 2018/ns CRL.M.C. 3310/2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial