Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abhishek Gupta vs.state

Abhishek Gupta vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 23, 2018
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1216341

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abhishek Gupta

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....sections 406/454/380 ipc, police station mandir marg.2. subject fir was registered consequent to a transaction of sale of a property, which the petitioner was intending to sell and the complaint was purchasing the same. pending the proceedings, the parties were referred to mediation. a settlement agreement dated bail appln. 129/2016 page 1 of 2 01.06.2018 has been executed between the parties.3. the petitioner as well as mrs. shikha pahuja, the daughter of the complainant (the complainant has since expired) are present in court in person. they confirm that the settlement agreement dated 01.06.2018 has been executed between the parties and both the parties undertake that they shall abide by the terms of settlement agreement dated 01.06.2018.4. 5. the undertaking is accepted. keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the parties have settled, i am of the view that petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.6. in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the investigating officer/arresting officer/sho on petitioner furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer/sho. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master.7. 8. july23 2018/st bail appln. 129/2016 sanjeev sachdeva, j page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 129/2016 Judgment delivered on:

23. 07.2018 ABHISHEK GUPTA STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for State. Mr. N.K. Aggarwal, Advocate for the complainant with daughter of complainant in person. Insp. Ishwar Singh, Crime Branch. JUDGMENT2307.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 129/2016 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.416/2015 under Sections 406/454/380 IPC, Police Station Mandir Marg.

2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a transaction of sale of a property, which the petitioner was intending to sell and the complaint was purchasing the same. Pending the proceedings, the parties were referred to mediation. A Settlement Agreement dated BAIL APPLN. 129/2016 Page 1 of 2 01.06.2018 has been executed between the parties.

3. The petitioner as well as Mrs. Shikha Pahuja, the daughter of the complainant (the complainant has since expired) are present in Court in person. They confirm that the Settlement Agreement dated 01.06.2018 has been executed between the parties and both the parties undertake that they shall abide by the terms of settlement agreement dated 01.06.2018.

4. 5. The undertaking is accepted. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the parties have settled, I am of the view that petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/SHO on petitioner furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting officer/SHO. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

7. 8. JULY23 2018/st BAIL APPLN. 129/2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial