Balaji D and Anr. Vs.air India Engineering Services Limited and Anr.

Balaji D and Anr. vs Air India Engineering Services Limited and Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 04, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1213927

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1213927
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Apr 04, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Balaji D and Anr.

Respondent

Air India Engineering Services Limited and Anr.

Excerpt

.....are trainee aircraft maintenance engineers and in this writ petition, they seek a mandamus to first respondent to place them in a&c trade and to include the name of petitioners for the forthcoming director general civil aviation approved b-1 course conducted by respondents. learned counsel for petitioners submits that the aforesaid b-1 course is likely to commence this month only. learned counsel for petitioners claims that the relief as claimed in this petition was sought from the respondents by way of application of 22nd may, 2017 which was followed by successive applications of 15th january, 2018 and 18th january, 2018 (annexure p-1 colly) but to no avail. w.p.(c) no.3194/2018 page 1 2. in the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition and the applications with direction to first respondent to effectively consider petitioners’ applications (annexure p-1 colly) within a week, if not already done and the fate of these applications be made known to petitioners within three days thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedy as available in law, if need be.3. it is made clear that if for any reason, petitioners’ applications (annexure p-1 colly) are not accepted, then the reasons for non-acceptance be spelt out and conveyed to petitioners promptly.4. with aforesaid directions, this petition and the applications are disposed of. copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for parties. (sunil gaur) judge april04 2018 mamta w.p.(c) no.3194/2018 page 2

Full Judgment

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of order : April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 3194/2018 & CM Nos.12697-98/2018 BALAJI D AND ANR. ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr.Virender Singh Kadian, Advocate versus AIR INDIA ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED AND ANR. Through: Ms.Suruchi Suri, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS

Ms.Anjana Gosain, Ms.Rabiya Singh Thakur and Ms.Shalini Nair, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

s claim that they are Trainee Aircraft Maintenance Engineers and in this writ petition, they seek a mandamus to first respondent to place them in A&C Trade and to include the name of petitioners for the forthcoming Director General Civil Aviation Approved B-1 Course conducted by respondents. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the aforesaid B-1 Course is likely to commence this month only. Learned counsel for petitioners claims that the relief as claimed in this petition was sought from the respondents by way of application of 22nd May, 2017 which was followed by successive applications of 15th January, 2018 and 18th January, 2018 (Annexure P-1 Colly) but to no avail. W.P.(C) No.3194/2018 Page 1 2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition and the applications with direction to first respondent to effectively consider petitioners’ applications (Annexure P-1 Colly) within a week, if not already done and the fate of these applications be made known to petitioners within three days thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedy as available in law, if need be.

3. It is made clear that if for any reason, petitioners’ applications (Annexure P-1 Colly) are not accepted, then the reasons for non-acceptance be spelt out and conveyed to petitioners promptly.

4. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the applications are disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for parties. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE APRIL04 2018 mamta W.P.(C) No.3194/2018 Page 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Balaji D and Anr. vs Air India Engineering Services Limited a... Same Subject Land Acquisition