Full Judgment
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:
21. 2.2018 + W.P.(C) 1658/2018 & CM No.6824-25/2018 NASIMA KHATOON ........ Petitioner
Through : Ms. Richa Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS
Through : Mr. Jawahar Raja, Advocate for R1 and R2. CORAM:-
"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
(ORAL) 1. This is a writ petition, whereby, challenge is laid to order dated 28.11.2017, passed by the SDM, Seelampur.
2. Record shows that ICICI Lombard has obtained the impugned attachment order. The attachment order is directed against the son of the petitioner. The petitioner, who is the mother, claims to be the owner of the subject property. The ownership claim is based on a General Power of Attorney. According to the petitioner, the said Power of Attorney is registered.
3. A perusal of the Power of Attorney shows that it is executed in favour of the petitioner only to manage, sell, mortgage etcetera, the W.P.(C) 1658/2018 Page 1 of2 subject property. There is no reference to any consideration in the Power of Attorney.
4. The claim of the petitioner that she has title and is the owner of the property, prima facie, is not made out.
5. Writ Petition is, accordingly,dismissed.
6. The petitioner, however, will have liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedies to establish her title and ownership, albeit, in accordance with law.
7. Consequently, all pending applications are closed. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY21 2018 c W.P.(C) 1658/2018 Page 2 of2