Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Surendra Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Surendra Singh and ors. vs State of Bihar and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 1995
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/121223

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Misc. No. 18475 of 1994
Subject
;Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 144 and 107--Proceedings under Section 144--Validity--Partition suit in respect of disputed land pending--In earlier proceeding court directed that in case of apprehension of breach of peace, Magistrate may initiate a proceeding under Section 107 of the Code against the wrong...

Key legal issue
;Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surendra Singh and ors.

Respondent

State of Bihar and ors.

Court's Analysis

Prior History

B.N. Agarwal, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This application has been filed for quashing order dated 29.11.1944 whereby proceeding under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as 'Code') has been initiated and the parties have been restrained from going over the disputed land.
3. According to the petitioners, there was a partition suit in the year 1951, in which decree was passed and the disputed land was allotted to their share. According to the private opp

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - sections 144 and 107--proceedings under section 144--validity--partition suit in respect of disputed land pending--in earlier proceeding court directed that in case of apprehension of breach of peace, magistrate may initiate a proceeding under section 107 of the code against the wrong doer--held, proceeding under section 144 was quashed--but in case of apprehension of breach of peace, magistrate may initiate a proceeding under section 107 of the code against wrongdoer-- - b.n. agarwal, j.1. heard the parties.2. this application has been filed for quashing order dated 29.11.1944 whereby proceeding under section 144 of the code of criminal procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as 'code') has been initiated and the parties have been restrained from going over the disputed land.3. according to the petitioners, there was a partition suit in the year 1951, in which decree was passed and the disputed land was allotted to their share. according to the private opposite parties, they have filed a partition suit in respect of disputed land, which is pending. it appears that earlier also successive proceedings were taken. when the matter was brought to this court, this court directed that since the order had lapsed its force, it was not necessary to dispose of the application on merit. this court further directed that if there is apprehension of breach of peace, it will be open to the learned magistrate to initiate a proceeding under section 107 of the code against the wrong doer. in view of the aforesaid facts, i am of the opinion that the learned magistrate was not justified in initiating the proceeding under section 144 of the code.4. accordingly, this application is allowed and the proceeding under section 144 of the code is hereby quashed. it is directed that if during the pendency of partition suit no. 308 of 1982, pending in the court of munsif ist. hajipur, any material is produced before the learned magistrate to show that there is an apprehension of breach of peace in respect to the disputed land, he shall not initiate a proceeding under section 144 of the code but it will be open to him to initiate a proceeding under section 107 of the code against the wrong doer.5. with the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

Full Judgment

B.N. Agarwal, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. This application has been filed for quashing order dated 29.11.1944 whereby proceeding under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as 'Code') has been initiated and the parties have been restrained from going over the disputed land.

3. According to the petitioners, there was a partition suit in the year 1951, in which decree was passed and the disputed land was allotted to their share. According to the private opposite parties, they have filed a partition suit in respect of disputed land, which is pending. It appears that earlier also successive proceedings were taken. When the matter was brought to this Court, this Court directed that since the order had lapsed its force, it was not necessary to dispose of the application on merit. This Court further directed that if there is apprehension of breach of peace, it will be open to the learned Magistrate to initiate a proceeding under Section 107 of the Code against the wrong doer. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am of the opinion that the learned Magistrate was not justified in initiating the proceeding under Section 144 of the Code.

4. Accordingly, this application is allowed and the proceeding under Section 144 of the Code is hereby quashed. It is directed that if during the pendency of Partition Suit No. 308 of 1982, pending in the court of Munsif Ist. Hajipur, any material is produced before the learned Magistrate to show that there is an apprehension of breach of peace in respect to the disputed land, he shall not initiate a proceeding under Section 144 of the Code but it will be open to him to initiate a proceeding under Section 107 of the Code against the wrong doer.

5. With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial