Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aman Jain vs.state & Anr

Aman Jain vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 11, 2017
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1208824

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aman Jain

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....respondents through mr.r.s. kundu, asc for state with si nagender nagar, p.s.sarita vihar. respondent no.2/complainant in person. coram: hon'ble mr. justice vinod goel % 1.2. 3. order1109.2017 respondent no.2 appears in person. he is duly identified by the io si nagender nagar. the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of the constitution of india read with section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short ‘cr.pc’) for quashing of the fir bearing no.258/2016, registered on 27.05.2016 against him with police station sarita vihar, district south east, delhi, under section 406 ipc, on the complaint of respondent no.2. learned asc through the io submit that the charge sheet has so far not been filed. however, during the investigation, offence under section 420 ipc had also been added. w.p. (crl.) 1639/2017 page 1 of 2 4.5. 6.7. 8. the petitioner and respondent no.2 submit that later on they had amicably resolved and settled their all disputes by way of settlement dated 21.02.2017. the copy of the same is placed on record. the respondent no.2 states that he had amicably resolved and settled the disputes with the petitioner and received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner. he submits that he does not want to pursue the said fir. he submits that the said fir may be quashed. since the parties have amicably settled their all disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing with the said fir. hence, to secure ends of justice, the fir bearing no.258/2016, registered on 27.05.2016 against them with police station sarita vihar, delhi, under section 406 ipc and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. the petition is disposed of accordingly. dasti. september11 2017/jitender vinod goel, j.w.p. (crl.) 1639/2017 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1639/2017 AMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner

Through Mr.Hemant Goel, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with SI Nagender Nagar, P.S.Sarita Vihar. Respondent No.2/Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % 1.

2. 3. ORDER

1109.2017 Respondent No.2 appears in person. He is duly identified by the IO SI Nagender Nagar. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.PC’) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.258/2016, registered on 27.05.2016 against him with Police Station Sarita Vihar, District South East, Delhi, under Section 406 IPC, on the complaint of respondent No.2. Learned ASC through the IO submit that the charge sheet has so far not been filed. However, during the investigation, offence under Section 420 IPC had also been added. W.P. (Crl.) 1639/2017 Page 1 of 2 4.

5. 6.

7. 8. The petitioner and respondent No.2 submit that later on they had amicably resolved and settled their all disputes by way of Settlement dated 21.02.2017. The copy of the same is placed on record. The respondent No.2 states that he had amicably resolved and settled the disputes with the petitioner and received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner. He submits that he does not want to pursue the said FIR. He submits that the said FIR may be quashed. Since the parties have amicably settled their all disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing with the said FIR. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No.258/2016, registered on 27.05.2016 against them with Police Station Sarita Vihar, Delhi, under Section 406 IPC and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Dasti. SEPTEMBER11 2017/jitender VINOD GOEL, J.

W.P. (Crl.) 1639/2017 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial