Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Beena Devi & Ors. Vs.hdfc Ergo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Beena Devi & Ors. vs Hdfc Ergo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 21, 2017
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1208042

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Beena Devi & Ors.

Advocate Mr. Anshuman Bal

Respondent

Hdfc Ergo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Advocate Mr. A.K. Soni

Excerpt

.....rs. 25,000/- mac appeal no.137/2017 page 1 of 2 towards funeral expenses, rs. 20,000/- towards loss to estate and rs. 20,000/- towards loss of consortium.2. the appellants are aggrieved by the said judgment and submit that the aforesaid non-pecuniary damages awarded are inadequate. following the view taken in mac.app.no.160/2015 shriram general insurance co ltd v. usha decided by this court on 05.05.2016, the submission of the claimants/appellants is found to be correct.3. therefore, in lieu of the awards under the above heads granted by the tribunal, non-pecuniary damages in the sum of rs. 1,50,000/- each towards loss of love & affection and towards loss of consortium and rs. 50,000/- each towards loss of estate and funeral expense are added to the total compensation. thus, the award would stand increased by (4,00,000 - 1,95,000) rs. 2,05,000/-.4. given the dispensation in favour of other claimants, it is directed that the entire enhanced amount shall fall to the share of first appellant (beena devi), wife of the deceased it to be released with interest @ 9% per annum in the form of fixed deposit receipt for a period of seven years though with liberty given to her to draw monthly interest.5. insurer will be duty bound to deposit the enhanced portion with the tribunal within thirty days, making it available to be released.6. the appeal stands disposed of in above terms. r.k.gauba, j.august21 2017 nk mac appeal no.137/2017 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:

21. t August, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.137/2017 BEENA DEVI & ORS. .... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. versus HDFC ERGO GEN. INS. CO. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Satender Singh, 32 years old, died as a result of injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 28.03.2013 due to negligent driving of car make Mahindra Scorpio bearing registration No.HR51W9317 admittedly insured against third party risk with the first respondent (insurer). His wife and other members of the family dependent upon him, they being the appellants herein, instituted accident claim case (suit No.250/2013) which was allowed by the tribunal vide judgment dated 21.07.2016 and compensation in the sum of Rs. 13,07,000/- was granted to the claimants / appellants, the liability being fastened on the insurance company (first respondent). The said amount includes non-pecuniary damages in the sum of Rs. 1 lakh towards loss of love & affection, Rs. 25,000/- MAC Appeal No.137/2017 Page 1 of 2 towards funeral expenses, Rs. 20,000/- towards loss to estate and Rs. 20,000/- towards loss of consortium.

2. The appellants are aggrieved by the said judgment and submit that the aforesaid non-pecuniary damages awarded are inadequate. Following the view taken in MAC.APP.No.160/2015 Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Usha decided by this court on 05.05.2016, the submission of the claimants/appellants is found to be correct.

3. Therefore, in lieu of the awards under the above heads granted by the tribunal, non-pecuniary damages in the sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- each towards loss of love & affection and towards loss of consortium and Rs. 50,000/- each towards loss of estate and funeral expense are added to the total compensation. Thus, the award would stand increased by (4,00,000 - 1,95,000) Rs. 2,05,000/-.

4. Given the dispensation in favour of other claimants, it is directed that the entire enhanced amount shall fall to the share of first appellant (Beena Devi), wife of the deceased it to be released with interest @ 9% per annum in the form of fixed deposit receipt for a period of seven years though with liberty given to her to draw monthly interest.

5. Insurer will be duty bound to deposit the enhanced portion with the tribunal within thirty days, making it available to be released.

6. The appeal stands disposed of in above terms. R.K.GAUBA, J.

AUGUST21 2017 nk MAC Appeal No.137/2017 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial