Raj Kumar vs.state & Anr.

Raj Kumar vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 01, 2017

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1207565

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1207565
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Aug 01, 2017
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raj Kumar

Respondent

State & Anr.

Advocate Mr. R.S. Kundu, Mr. Ankit Malik

Excerpt

.....the application is disposed of. w.p.(crl) 2186/2017 1. notice. learned asc, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice.2. the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of constitution of india read with section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short ‘cr.pc) for quashing of fir page 1 of 3 w.p. (crl.) no.2186/2017 no.948/2014, registered on 11.12.2014 with police station okhla industrial area, delhi, under section 354-d ipc.3. as per allegations, the petitioner was stalking the complainant for days. the complainant called her husband on phone who came there. the husband of the complainant caught hold of the petitioner but he managed to get released and fled away.4. on making a reference by the learned mm, mahila court, saket courts, delhi, the parties have amicably settled their dispute in the mediation centre, saket courts, new delhi. the petitioner has shown deep regret to the respondent no.2 and assured her that the same shall not take place in future.5. the respondent no.2, present in court and is duly identified by the io, submits that she has amicably settled the matter and she does not want to pursue with the fir. she requests that fir may be quashed.6. learned asc through the io submits that the matter is pending before the learned mm.7. the petitioner present in the court undertakes that he shall not repeat such behaviour in future.8. in these circumstances, when the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no purpose would be served in further pursuing with the fir bearing no.948/2014, registered on 11.12.2014 with police station okhla industrial area, delhi, under section 354-d ipc. hence, to secure ends of justice, the fir bearing no.948/2014, registered on 11.12.2014 with police station okhla industrial area, delhi, under section 354-d ipc and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. page 2 of 3 w.p. (crl.) no.2186/2017 9. the petition is disposed of. august01.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~43 * + W.P.(CRL) 2186/2017 RAJ KUMAR Through: Mr.Kamran Malik, Advocate with Mr.Umesh Chandra, Advocate along with petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner

versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC for the State with Mr.Peeyush Bhatia and Mr. Ankit Malik, Advocates along with SI Bijender Singh, PS Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi. Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER

0108.2017 Crl.M.A. 12302/2017 (delay in re-filing) This is an application for condonation of delay in re-filing the petition. For the reasons explained, the delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2186/2017 1. Notice. Learned ASC, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice.

2. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.PC) for quashing of FIR Page 1 of 3 W.P. (Crl.) No.2186/2017 No.948/2014, registered on 11.12.2014 with Police Station Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi, under Section 354-D IPC.

3. As per allegations, the petitioner was stalking the complainant for
days. The complainant called her husband on phone who came there. The husband of the complainant caught hold of the petitioner but he managed to get released and fled away.

4. On making a reference by the learned MM, Mahila Court, Saket Courts, Delhi, the parties have amicably settled their dispute in the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi. The petitioner has shown deep regret to the respondent No.2 and assured her that the same shall not take place in future.

5. The respondent No.2, present in court and is duly identified by the IO, submits that she has amicably settled the matter and she does not want to pursue with the FIR. She requests that FIR may be quashed.

6. Learned ASC through the IO submits that the matter is pending before the learned MM.

7. The petitioner present in the Court undertakes that he shall not repeat such behaviour in future.

8. In these circumstances, when the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no purpose would be served in further pursuing with the FIR bearing No.948/2014, registered on 11.12.2014 with Police Station Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi, under Section 354-D IPC. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No.948/2014, registered on 11.12.2014 with Police Station Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi, under Section 354-D IPC and proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. Page 2 of 3 W.P. (Crl.) No.2186/2017 9. The petition is disposed of. AUGUST01 2017 “sk” VINOD GOEL, J.

Page 3 of 3 W.P. (Crl.) No.2186/2017

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Raj Kumar vs State & Anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition