Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nazim vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors

Nazim vs The State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 07, 2017
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1204672

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nazim

Respondent

The State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors

Excerpt

$~28 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi decided on : march07 2017 + crl.m.c. 760/2016 nazim ........ petitioner through : mr.r.p.s.bhati, advocate. versus the state ( govt of nct of delhi) & ors........ respondents through : ms.meenakshi dahiya, app. coram: hon'ble mr. justice s.p.garg s.p.garg, j.(oral) 1. present petition under section 482 cr.p.c. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of fir no.54/2010 under sections 354/341/323 ipc registered at police station seelampur. it is stated that the matter has been settled with the respondents no.2 and 3 amicably.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have summoned the trial court record. on perusal of the trial court record, it reveals that all the prosecution witnesses have since been examined. statement of the petitioner under section 313 cr.p.c. has been recorded. arguments have been heard and the case is fixed for final disposal. no plausible explanation has been offered by the petitioner as to why the matter was not settled at the earlier stages. after the victims have examined crl.m.c.760/2016 page 1 of 2 themselves on oath and the matter is fixed for final disposal, it is not a fit case to quash proceedings under section 482 cr.p.c. on the basis of settlement. the petitioner must wait for the verdict of the trial court. the petition is dismissed. trial court record be sent back forthwith along with the copy of 3.4. the order. march07 2017 sa (s.p.garg) judge crl.m.c.760/2016 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MARCH07 2017 + CRL.M.C. 760/2016 NAZIM ........ Petitioner

Through : Mr.R.P.S.Bhati, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS........ RESPONDENTS

Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.

(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.54/2010 under Sections 354/341/323 IPC registered at police Station Seelampur. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the respondents No.2 and 3 amicably.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have summoned the Trial Court record. On perusal of the Trial Court record, it reveals that all the prosecution witnesses have since been examined. Statement of the petitioner under Section 313 Cr.P.C. has been recorded. Arguments have been heard and the case is fixed for final disposal. No plausible explanation has been offered by the petitioner as to why the matter was not settled at the earlier stages. After the victims have examined Crl.M.C.760/2016 Page 1 of 2 themselves on oath and the matter is fixed for final disposal, it is not a fit case to quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the basis of settlement. The petitioner must wait for the verdict of the trial court. The petition is dismissed. Trial Court record be sent back forthwith along with the copy of 3.

4. the order. MARCH07 2017 sa (S.P.GARG) JUDGE Crl.M.C.760/2016 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial