Mukul Bhatia vs.state

Mukul Bhatia vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 02, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1204586

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1204586
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Mar 02, 2017
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mukul Bhatia

Respondent

State

Excerpt

$~6 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi decided on :2. d march, 2017 mukul bhatia crl.m.c. 3830/2016 ........ petitioner through : mr.parth goswami, advocate. state versus through : ms.meenakshi dahiya, app with si sandeep kumar, ps rani bagh. ..... respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice s.p.garg + s.p.garg, j.(oral) 1. present petition under section 482 cr.p.c. has been preferred to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 30.09.2016 in case fir no.9registered under sections 4ipc at ps rani bagh whereby the permission to travel usa was declined. status report / additional status report are on record.2. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. it is informed that after the registration of the fir the petitioner has travelled abroad and has returned. the present petition for permission to travel abroad after getting bail has been filed.3. learned app states that the documents filed by the petitioner has since been verified and found genuine. charge-sheet has yet not been crl.m.c. 3830/2016 page 1 of 2 filed. the petitioner is a senior citizen and intends to visit his family members settled in usa. telephone number of his son has been provided to facilitate his availability during his visit abroad.4. in the interest of justice and to enable the petitioner to visit abroad to meet his family members, he is granted permission to travel from 25.04.2017 to 22.07.2017 on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `1 lac with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court subject to the condition that he shall furnish the detailed itinerary to the investigating officer. on return, he shall intimate the investigating agency / trial court within a week.5. the petition stands disposed of. march02 2017 / tr (s.p.garg) judge crl.m.c. 3830/2016 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :

2. d MARCH, 2017 MUKUL BHATIA CRL.M.C. 3830/2016 ........ Petitioner

Through : Mr.Parth Goswami, Advocate. STATE versus Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Sandeep Kumar, PS Rani Bagh. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.

(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 30.09.2016 in case FIR No.9
registered under Sections 4
IPC at PS Rani Bagh whereby the permission to travel USA was declined. Status report / Additional Status report are on record.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. It is informed that after the registration of the FIR the petitioner has travelled abroad and has returned. The present petition for permission to travel abroad after getting bail has been filed.

3. Learned APP states that the documents filed by the petitioner has since been verified and found genuine. Charge-sheet has yet not been CRL.M.C. 3830/2016 Page 1 of 2 filed. The petitioner is a senior citizen and intends to visit his family members settled in USA. Telephone number of his son has been provided to facilitate his availability during his visit abroad.

4. In the interest of justice and to enable the petitioner to visit abroad to meet his family members, he is granted permission to travel from 25.04.2017 to 22.07.2017 on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `1 lac with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court subject to the condition that he shall furnish the detailed itinerary to the Investigating Officer. On return, he shall intimate the Investigating Agency / Trial Court within a week.

5. The petition stands disposed of. MARCH02 2017 / tr (S.P.GARG) JUDGE CRL.M.C. 3830/2016 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Mukul Bhatia vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition