Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anil Kumar Madan vs.cbi

Anil Kumar Madan vs Cbi

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 23, 2017
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1203667

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Kumar Madan

Respondent

Cbi

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on :9. h november, 2016 decided on :23. d february, 2017 crl.rev.p. 181/2012 & crl.m.a.no.4188/2012 anil kumar madan cbi through : mr.nitin soni, advocate with versus through : ms.sonia mathur, standing counsel mr.kewin kunjappy, advocate. ..... respondent ........ petitioner with mr.sushil kumar dubey & mr.abhishek chauhan, advocates. coram: hon'ble mr. justice s.p.garg + s.p.garg, j.the present revision petition is dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of crl.rev.p. 182/2012 titled ‘purushottam dev arya vs. cbi ’. (s.p.garg) judge february23 2017 / tr

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :

9. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :

23. d FEBRUARY, 2017 CRL.REV.P. 181/2012 & CRL.M.A.No.4188/2012 ANIL KUMAR MADAN CBI Through : Mr.Nitin Soni, Advocate with versus Through : Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel Mr.Kewin Kunjappy, Advocate. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner

with Mr.Sushil Kumar Dubey & Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.

The present revision petition is dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.Rev.P. 182/2012 titled ‘Purushottam Dev Arya vs. CBI ’. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE FEBRUARY23 2017 / tr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial