Doris John Vs. Jane Wesley

Doris John vs Jane Wesley

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Sep 19, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1193898

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1193898
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Decided On: Sep 19, 2018
Case Number: 26872 / 2006
Subject: Civil
Source Link: http://sci.gov.in//supremecourt/2006/26872/26872_2006_Judgement_19-Sep-2018.pdf

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Doris John

Advocate Anjana Chandrashekar

Respondent

Jane Wesley

Advocate Jagjit Singh Chhabra

Excerpt

in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no(s). 2403/2008 non-reportable doris john & anr. appellant(s) versus jane wesley respondent(s) kurian, j.judgment the dispute in this case originated in 1992, leading to a suit for eviction. the trial court dismissed the eviction petition and the same was reversed by the high court. thus, the appellants are before this court.2. on hearing the parties for some time, we sensed an element of settlement and accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the parties were referred to the bangalore mediation centre, bengalure, to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement.3. we are happy to note that before the bangalore mediation centre, bengalure, the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement of all the disputes between them. they have also filed a memorandum of settlement dated 30.05.2018 duly signed by the parties, which shall form part of this judgment.4. the appeal is disposed of in terms of the memorandum of settlement dated 30.05.2018. let a decree be drawn in terms of the settlement, referred to above. 1 5. pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.6. there shall be no orders as to costs. .......................j.[kurian joseph]. new delhi; september19 2018. .......................j.[sanjay kishan kaul]. 2

Full Judgment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2403/2008 NON-REPORTABLE DORIS JOHN & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JANE WESLEY RESPONDENT(S) KURIAN, J.

JUDGMENT

The dispute in this case originated in 1992, leading to a suit for eviction. The Trial Court dismissed the eviction petition and the same was reversed by the High Court. Thus, the appellants are before this Court.

2. On hearing the parties for some time, we sensed an element of settlement and accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the parties were referred to the Bangalore Mediation Centre, Bengalure, to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement.

3. We are happy to note that before the Bangalore Mediation Centre, Bengalure, the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement of all the disputes between them. They have also filed a Memorandum of Settlement dated 30.05.2018 duly signed by the parties, which shall form part of this judgment.

4. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 30.05.2018. Let a decree be drawn in terms of the settlement, referred to above. 1 5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. There shall be no orders as to costs. .......................J.

[KURIAN JOSEPH]. NEW DELHI; SEPTEMBER19 2018. .......................J.

[SANJAY KISHAN KAUL]. 2

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2018 Same Parties Doris John vs Jane Wesley Same Subject Civil Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjay...