V.m. Manomani Vs. Shanthi

V.m. Manomani vs Shanthi

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Nov 27, 2017

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1193053

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1193053
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
Decided On: Nov 27, 2017
Case Number: 23371 / 2005
Subject: Land Acquisition
Source Link: http://sci.gov.in//supremecourt/2005/23371/23371_2005_Judgement_27-Nov-2017.pdf

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.m. Manomani

Advocate Romy Chacko

Respondent

Shanthi

Advocate Bharat Sangal

Excerpt

in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no(s). 5996/2009 non-reportable v.m. manomani & ors. appellant(s) versus shanthi respondent(s) judgmentkurian, j.i.a. no.120640/2017 is allowed.1. 2. learned counsel for the parties submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled out of court and the suit property has been transferred to mr. maurice rosario menezes, newly added respondent. an application has also been filed on behalf of 3. mr. maurice rosario menezes for disposal of the civil appeal.4. in view of the settlement between the parties, nothing survives in this appeal, which is, accordingly, disposed of.5. disposed of. pending applications, if any, shall stand 1 6. there shall be no orders as to costs. new delhi; november27 2017. .......................j.[kurian joseph]. .......................j.[amitava roy]. 2

Full Judgment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5996/2009 NON-REPORTABLE V.M. MANOMANI & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SHANTHI RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

I.A. No.120640/2017 is allowed.

1. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled out of Court and the suit property has been transferred to Mr. Maurice Rosario Menezes, newly added respondent. An application has also been filed on behalf of 3. Mr. Maurice Rosario Menezes for disposal of the civil appeal.

4. In view of the settlement between the parties, nothing survives in this appeal, which is, accordingly, disposed of.

5. disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand 1 6. There shall be no orders as to costs. NEW DELHI; NOVEMBER27 2017. .......................J.

[KURIAN JOSEPH]. .......................J.

[AMITAVA ROY]. 2

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2017 Same Parties V.m. Manomani vs Shanthi Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amitav...