Angappan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others

Angappan vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Feb 23, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192463

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1192463
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Feb 23, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 3147 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Angappan

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.10.2015.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.10.2015. 2. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. on reading of the complaint dated 17.10.2015, it is seen that there is a dispute pending between the petitioner and the opposite party, in connection with a government poramboke land. it is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite party is trying to fence the land and when it was questioned, the opposite party has abused him by calling his caste name. the averments in the complaint do not inspire confidence of this court for issuing a direction to the respondent police to register an fir. hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent to register an fir on the complaint dated 17.10.2015 given by the petitioner. accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.10.2015.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 17.10.2015.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. On reading of the complaint dated 17.10.2015, it is seen that there is a dispute pending between the petitioner and the opposite party, in connection with a Government Poramboke Land. It is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite party is trying to fence the land and when it was questioned, the opposite party has abused him by calling his caste name. The averments in the complaint do not inspire confidence of this Court for issuing a direction to the respondent police to register an FIR. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent to register an FIR on the complaint dated 17.10.2015 given by the petitioner.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Angappan vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge P.N. Prakash