S. Marimuthu and Others Vs. The Director General of Police, Chennai and Others

S. Marimuthu and Others vs The Director General of Police, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Feb 26, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1192387
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Feb 26, 2016
Case Number: Crl. O.P. (MD) No. 3390 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Marimuthu and Others

Respondent

The Director General of Police, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondent no. 3 to 6 not to harass the petitioner and his family members without any legally sustainable complaint and to direct the respondent no. 2 to follow the guideline issued by the honourable supreme court in d.k.basu (1997 1 scc 416) case in matters pertaining to arrest or interrogation and consequently to direct the respondent no. 2 to take action against the respondent nos.3,5 and 6.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondent nos.3 to 6 not to harass the petitioner and his family members without any legally sustainable complaint and to direct the 2nd respondent to follow the guidelines issued by the supreme court in d.k.basu (1997 1 scc 416) case in matters pertaining to arrest or interrogation and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to take action against the respondent nos.3,5 and 6. 2. when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioners are accused in crime no.211 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police. 3. under such circumstances, no positive or usual direction of not to harass can be passed in this petition and hence, this criminal original petition is dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Respondent No. 3 to 6 not to harass the petitioner and his family members without any legally sustainable complaint and to direct the Respondent No. 2 to follow the guideline issued by the Honourable Supreme Court in D.K.Basu (1997 1 SCC 416) case in matters pertaining to arrest or interrogation and consequently to direct the Respondent No. 2 to take action against the Respondent Nos.3,5 and 6.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 not to harass the petitioner and his family members without any legally sustainable complaint and to direct the 2^nd respondent to follow the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in D.K.Basu (1997 1 SCC 416) case in matters pertaining to arrest or interrogation and consequently to direct the 2^nd respondent to take action against the respondent Nos.3,5 and 6.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioners are accused in Crime No.211 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police.

3. Under such circumstances, no positive or usual direction of not to harass can be passed in this petition and hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties S. Marimuthu and Others vs The Director General of Police, Ch... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge P.N. Prakash