Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A. Kasimayan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others

A. Kasimayan vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 04, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192236

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(MD) No. 4151 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Kasimayan

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to conduct the festival of masi pachai maha sivarathiri in arulmigu ochandamman periya temple in pappapatti village, usilampatti taluk peacefully on 07.03.2016 to 09.03.2016.)p.n. prakash, j. 1. this writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to conduct the festival of masi pachai maha sivarathiri in arulmigu ochandamman periya temple in pappapatti village, usilampatti taluk peacefully on 07.03.2016 to 09.03.2016. 2. it is seen that there is a serious dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5 with regard to celebration of the festival. in a dispute of this nature, this court, in writ proceedings, cannot embark upon disputed question of facts and it is for the parties to agitate their claim before the civil court. 3. hence, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move the civil court. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to conduct the festival of Masi Pachai Maha Sivarathiri in Arulmigu Ochandamman Periya Temple in Pappapatti Village, Usilampatti Taluk peacefully on 07.03.2016 to 09.03.2016.)

P.N. Prakash, J.

1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the Respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to conduct the festival of Masi Pachai Maha Sivarathiri in Arulmigu Ochandamman Periya Temple in Pappapatti Village, Usilampatti Taluk peacefully on 07.03.2016 to 09.03.2016.

2. It is seen that there is a serious dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5 with regard to celebration of the festival. In a dispute of this nature, this Court, in writ proceedings, cannot embark upon disputed question of facts and it is for the parties to agitate their claim before the Civil Court.

3. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move the Civil Court. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial