A. Pasupathi and Another Vs. K. Durai and Others

A. Pasupathi and Another vs K. Durai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 15, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192024

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1192024
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: G. Chockalingam
Decided On: Mar 15, 2016
Case Number: C.R.P. (NPD)No. 666 of 2004 & C.M.P (MD) No. 6492 of 2004
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Pasupathi and Another

Respondent

K. Durai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: civil revision petition filed under article 227 of the constitution of india to call for the records relating to the proceedings in o.s.no.97 of 2003 on the file of the principal district munsif, valangaiman at kumbakonam to allow the civil revision petition and strike off the suit in o.s.no.97 of 2003.) 1. when the matter was called today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners filed a memo stating that the civil revision petition has become infructuous. the memo reads as follows: "the suit filed in o.s.no.97/2003 on the file of principal district munsif, valangaiman at kumbakonam was already disposed of. as against the decree and judgment passed in o.s.no.97/2003, the respondents filed appeal in a.s.no.56/2007 on the file of sub-court at kumbakonam. the appeal in a.s.no.56/2007 also was dismissed for default on 5.11.2009. therefore the above revision filed to strike off the plaint in o.s.no.97/2003 on the file of principal district munsif, valangaiman at kumbakonam has become 'infructuous' and to this effect the memo is filed." 2. recording the above memo filed by the petitioners, this civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the proceedings in O.S.No.97 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam to allow the civil revision petition and strike off the suit in O.S.No.97 of 2003.)

1. When the matter was called today, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners filed a memo stating that the civil revision petition has become infructuous. The memo reads as follows:

"The suit filed in O.S.No.97/2003 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam was already disposed of.

As against the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.97/2003, the respondents filed appeal in A.S.No.56/2007 on the file of Sub-Court at Kumbakonam. The appeal in A.S.No.56/2007 also was dismissed for default on 5.11.2009.

Therefore the above revision filed to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.97/2003 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam has become 'infructuous' and to this effect the memo is filed."

2. Recording the above memo filed by the petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties A. Pasupathi and Another vs K. Durai and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge G. Chockalingam