Arockiaraj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Another

Arockiaraj vs The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 29, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191799

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191799
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Mar 29, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5211 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arockiaraj

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to send the copy of the fir in crime no.396 of 2015 to the joint director health and family welfare, theni at periyakulam.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to send the copy of the fir in crime no.396 of 2015 to the joint director health and family welfare, theni at periyakulam. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioenr and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. the defacto complainant / petitioner is before this court. it is the case of the defacto complainant that on the complaint given by him, the respondent police registered a case in crime no.396 of 2015 against one jesudoss and four others for offences under sections 147, 294(b), 324 and 506(i) ipc and the investigation is pending. it is also stated that jesudoss was arrested by police and was in custody from 20.10.2015 to 28.10.2015. 4. while so, the defacto complainant has filed this present petition for a direction to the respondent police to send a copy of the fir to the joint director health and family welfare, theni at periyakulam. under the code of criminal procedure, case papers, fir and other relevant documents relating to the investigation of a particular case should have to be sent only to the jurisdictional magistrate and not to any one else. hence, the prayer of the petitioner cannot be acceded to. therefore, this criminal original petition is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed accordingly.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2^nd respondent to send the copy of the FIR in Crime No.396 of 2015 to the Joint Director Health and Family Welfare, Theni at Periyakulam.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2^nd respondent to send the copy of the FIR in Crime No.396 of 2015 to the Joint Director Health and Family Welfare, Theni at Periyakulam.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioenr and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. The defacto complainant / petitioner is before this Court. It is the case of the defacto complainant that on the complaint given by him, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.396 of 2015 against one Jesudoss and four others for offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 324 and 506(i) IPC and the investigation is pending. It is also stated that Jesudoss was arrested by Police and was in custody from 20.10.2015 to 28.10.2015.

4. While so, the defacto complainant has filed this present petition for a direction to the respondent police to send a copy of the FIR to the Joint Director Health and Family Welfare, Theni at Periyakulam. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, case papers, FIR and other relevant documents relating to the investigation of a particular case should have to be sent only to the jurisdictional Magistrate and not to any one else.

Hence, the prayer of the petitioner cannot be acceded to. Therefore, this Criminal Original petition is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed accordingly.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Arockiaraj vs The Superintendent of Police, Theni District an... Same Subject Education Same Judge P.N. Prakash