Indirakumar and Others Vs. State through The Inspector of Police and Others

Indirakumar and Others vs State through The Inspector of Police and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 30, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191772

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191772
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Mar 30, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 4790,4764 & 4776 of 2016
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Indirakumar and Others

Respondent

State through The Inspector of Police and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners in future by considering the petitioners' representation dated 13.01.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners in future by considering the petitioners' representation dated 13.01.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials placed on record. 3. it is represented by the learned government advocate (crl.side) that, on the complaint given by one varadarajan against these petitioners, petition enquiry is pending in csr no.57 of 2016. 4. the petitioners are directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, they shall not be harassed. during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an fir and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioners against arrest. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners in future by considering the petitioners' representation dated 13.01.2016.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners in future by considering the petitioners' representation dated 13.01.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials placed on record.

3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on the complaint given by one Varadarajan against these petitioners, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.57 of 2016.

4. The petitioners are directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, they shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioners against arrest.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Indirakumar and Others vs State through The Inspector of Poli... Same Subject Criminal Same Judge P.N. Prakash