Pradeep Kumar and Others Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Trichirappalli and Another

Pradeep Kumar and Others vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Trichirappalli and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 31, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191750

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191750
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Mar 31, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5530 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pradeep Kumar and Others

Respondent

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Trichirappalli and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, praying to call for the records relating to the impugned fir in crime no.78 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.) 1. this petition has been filed, seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned fir in crime no.78 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. on reading of the complaint, there are prima facie materials for the investigation to progress. 4. learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a suit in o.s.no.451 of 2012 has been filed by a.pari ahamed (a5) against the defacto complainant and the same is pending on the file of the district munsif court, trichirappalli. 5. the investigating officer is directed to take those factors into consideration and proceed with the investigation in accordance with law. during the course of investigation, if it is found that there is no offence made out, it is needless to say that the fir may be closed as mistake of fact. with the above observation, this criminal original petition is closed. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.78 of 2016 on the file of the 1^strespondent police and quash the same.)

1. This petition has been filed, seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.78 of 2016 on the file of the 1^strespondent police and quash the same.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. On reading of the complaint, there are prima facie materials for the investigation to progress.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a suit in O.S.No.451 of 2012 has been filed by A.Pari Ahamed (A5) against the defacto complainant and the same is pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Trichirappalli.

5. The Investigating Officer is directed to take those factors into consideration and proceed with the investigation in accordance with law. During the course of investigation, if it is found that there is no offence made out, it is needless to say that the FIR may be closed as mistake of fact.

With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Pradeep Kumar and Others vs State rep. by The Inspector of Po... Same Subject Education Same Judge P.N. Prakash