Anand Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District and Another

Anand vs The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 04, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191691

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191691
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Apr 04, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5308 of 2016
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anand

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action against the accused in crime no.39 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent by considering his representation dated 26.02.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action against the accused in crime no.39 of 2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent by considering his representation dated 26.02.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. on the complaint given by this petitioner, a case in crime no.39 of 2016 was registered by the respondent police on 26.01.2016 for offences under sections 147, 148, 294(b), 406, 418, 420, 442 and 506(ii) ipc and the investigation is in progress. 4. taking into consideration the nature of allegations in the fir in crime no.39 of 2016, this court is of the view that it will be in the interest of justice, if the case in crime no.39 of 2016 is directed to be monitored by the deputy superintendent of police, dindigul. 5. accordingly, the deputy superintendent of police, dindigul is directed to monitor the investigation of the case and expeditiously take action in accordance with law. with the above direction, this petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2^nd respondent to take appropriate action against the accused in Crime No.39 of 2016 on the file of the 2^nd respondent by considering his representation dated 26.02.2016.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2^nd respondent to take appropriate action against the accused in Crime No.39 of 2016 on the file of the 2^nd respondent by considering his representation dated 26.02.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. On the complaint given by this petitioner, a case in Crime No.39 of 2016 was registered by the respondent police on 26.01.2016 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 406, 418, 420, 442 and 506(ii) IPC and the investigation is in progress.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations in the FIR in Crime No.39 of 2016, this Court is of the view that it will be in the interest of justice, if the case in Crime No.39 of 2016 is directed to be monitored by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

5. Accordingly, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul is directed to monitor the investigation of the case and expeditiously take action in accordance with law.

With the above direction, this petition is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Anand vs The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District and ... Same Subject Criminal Same Judge P.N. Prakash