Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K. Saravanakumar Vs. State Represented by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Madurai

K. Saravanakumar vs State Represented by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Madurai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 06, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5703 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K. Saravanakumar

Respondent

State Represented by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Madurai

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondent to expedite the investigation in crime no.20 of 2016 and file final report within a time stipulated by this honourable court.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondent to expedite the investigation in crime no.20 of 2016 and file final report. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. it is seen that the petitioner lost his vehicle on 21.11.2015 and he had given a complaint on 24.11.2015, for which, csr no.534 of 2015 was given by the respondent police and thereafter, an fir in crime no.20 of 2016 was registered by the respondent police on 04.01.2016 under section 379 ipc against unknown accused. 4. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if the investigating officer gives a non-traceable certificate, so that the petitioner will work out his remedy before the insurance company. 5. recording the said submission, the respondent police is directed to enquire into the matter and issue a non-traceable certificate to the petitioner in accordance with law. with the above direction, this petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to expedite the investigation in Crime No.20 of 2016 and file final report within a time stipulated by this Honourable Court.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to expedite the investigation in Crime No.20 of 2016 and file final report.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. It is seen that the petitioner lost his vehicle on 21.11.2015 and he had given a complaint on 24.11.2015, for which, CSR No.534 of 2015 was given by the respondent police and thereafter, an FIR in Crime No.20 of 2016 was registered by the respondent police on 04.01.2016 under Section 379 IPC against unknown accused.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if the Investigating Officer gives a non-traceable certificate, so that the petitioner will work out his remedy before the Insurance Company.

5. Recording the said submission, the respondent police is directed to enquire into the matter and issue a non-traceable certificate to the petitioner in accordance with law.

With the above direction, this petition is disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial