Vasanthi Vs. The District Collector, Theni and Another

Vasanthi vs The District Collector, Theni and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 11, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191560

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191560
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: B. Rajendran
Decided On: Apr 11, 2016
Case Number: W.P (MD)No. 6948 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vasanthi

Respondent

The District Collector, Theni and Another

Excerpt

(prayer:writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to provide relief amount to the petitioner under rule 12(4) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) rules, 1995 schedule annexure-i within the time stipulated by this court and pass further orders as this court may deem fit and proper.) 1. the prayer in the writ petition is for a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to provide relief amount to the petitioner under rule 12(4) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) rules, 1995 schedule annexure-i. 2. when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the very f.i.r has been closed as 'mistake of fact' by filing a final report in crime no.1 of 2013 before the learned judicial magistrate, theni, on 14.10.2015, and the same was also communicated before this court on 27.10.2015, as per the direction given in crl.o.p(md)no.14087 of 2012. 3. therefore, the prayer in the writ petition at this stage is not maintainable. accordingly, this writ petition is closed reserving the right for the petitioner to agitate before any other forum.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to provide relief amount to the petitioner under Rule 12(4) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 Schedule Annexure-I within the time stipulated by this Court and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.)

1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to provide relief amount to the petitioner under Rule 12(4) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 Schedule Annexure-I.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the very F.I.R has been closed as 'Mistake of Fact' by filing a final report in Crime No.1 of 2013 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni, on 14.10.2015, and the same was also communicated before this Court on 27.10.2015, as per the direction given in Crl.O.P(MD)No.14087 of 2012.

3. Therefore, the prayer in the writ petition at this stage is not maintainable. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed reserving the right for the petitioner to agitate before any other forum.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Vasanthi vs The District Collector, Theni and Another Same Subject Education Same Judge B. Rajendran