D. Rajaram Vs. State Represented by The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District and Others

D. Rajaram vs State Represented by The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 13, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191441

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191441
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Apr 13, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5295 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D. Rajaram

Respondent

State Represented by The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondents particularly the 3rd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law and pass any other order as this honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondents particularly the 3rd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in csr no.22 of 2016. 3. in view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the hon'ble apex court in lalitha kumari vs. govt. of u.p and others [2013 (4) crimes 243 (sc).in case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. on receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents particularly the 3rd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law and pass any other order as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents particularly the 3rd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.22 of 2016.

3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P and others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC).In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties D. Rajaram vs State Represented by The Superintendent of Poli... Same Subject Education Same Judge P.N. Prakash