Palanisamy and Another Vs. State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District and Another

Palanisamy and Another vs State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 20, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191276

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191276
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Apr 20, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5951 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Palanisamy and Another

Respondent

State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner and their family members under the guise of enquiry.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state, who would submit that on the complaint given by one lakhsmi against these petitioners-, the respondent police conducted an enquiry in csr no.42 of 2016 and the same has been closed on 26.03.2016. 3. recording the said submission, this petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2^nd Respondent not to harass the Petitioner and their family members under the guise of enquiry.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2^nd respondent not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint given by one Lakhsmi against these petitioners-, the respondent police conducted an enquiry in CSR No.42 of 2016 and the same has been closed on 26.03.2016.

3. Recording the said submission, this petition is closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Palanisamy and Another vs State represented by The Superinten... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge P.N. Prakash