Abuthahir Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Others

Abuthahir vs The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 22, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191182

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191182
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Apr 22, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 6149 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abuthahir

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondents to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 23.02.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 23.02.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the state. 3. on reading of the complaint dated 23.02.2016, it is seen that the petitioner has done business with the opposite party and it is alleged that the opposite party had not paid him the returns. even in the complaint the petitioner has stated that the opposite party has returned rs.49,000/-, rs,30,000/- and rs.10,000/- on various dates. since it essentially appears to be a dispute between the partners, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an fir. 4. hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 23.02.2016.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 23.02.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

3. On reading of the complaint dated 23.02.2016, it is seen that the petitioner has done business with the opposite party and it is alleged that the opposite party had not paid him the returns. Even in the complaint the petitioner has stated that the opposite party has returned Rs.49,000/-, Rs,30,000/- and Rs.10,000/- on various dates. Since it essentially appears to be a dispute between the partners, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR.

4. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Abuthahir vs The Superintendent of Police, Theni District and... Same Subject Education Same Judge P.N. Prakash