Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sethammal Vs. The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Wings, Ramanathapuram District and Another

Sethammal vs The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Wings, Ramanathapuram District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 22, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191181

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 6140 of 2016
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sethammal

Respondent

The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Wings, Ramanathapuram District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondent police to register a case on the report given to petitioner dated 05.03.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to register a case on the report given to petitioner dated 05.03.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the state. 3. on reading of the complaint dated 05.03.2016, the petitionerhas not even stated as to when the opposite party has fabricated false documents in respect of her property. hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an fir and the criminal original petition is dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent police to register a case on the report given to petitioner dated 05.03.2016.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to register a case on the report given to petitioner dated 05.03.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

3. On reading of the complaint dated 05.03.2016, the petitionerhas not even stated as to when the opposite party has fabricated false documents in respect of her property. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR and the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial