P. Radhakrishnan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu represented by The Inspector of Police Crime Branch

P. Radhakrishnan vs State of Tamil Nadu represented by The Inspector of Police Crime Branch

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 03, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190819

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190819
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Dr.(Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala
Decided On: Jun 03, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 7126 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P. Radhakrishnan

Respondent

State of Tamil Nadu represented by The Inspector of Police Crime Branch

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to direct the respondent not to harass him in the guise of investigation.) 1. it is an application seeking a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioner herein in the guise of enquiry. 2. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent. 3. the learned government advocate (crl.side) submitted that the presence of the petitioner is required only for the purpose of interrogation, as a case has been registered against him. 4. if the presence of the petitioner is required for interrogation, the respondent is directed to issue notice/summon fixing the place, date and time of enquiry/interrogation and to let off the petitioner after the closure of enquiry. 5. learned counsel for the respondent assured that except following the procedure stated supra, the petitioner shall not be called to the police station and this undertaking is recorded. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent not to harass him in the guise of investigation.)

1. It is an application seeking a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioner herein in the guise of enquiry.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the presence of the petitioner is required only for the purpose of interrogation, as a case has been registered against him.

4. If the presence of the petitioner is required for interrogation, the respondent is directed to issue notice/summon fixing the place, date and time of enquiry/interrogation and to let off the petitioner after the closure of enquiry.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent assured that except following the procedure stated supra, the petitioner shall not be called to the Police Station and this undertaking is recorded.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties P. Radhakrishnan vs State of Tamil Nadu represented by The In... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge The Honourable Dr.(Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala