Venkatachalam Vs. The District Superintendent of Police and Another

Venkatachalam vs The District Superintendent of Police and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 06, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190767

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190767
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Dr. (Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala
Decided On: Jun 06, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 7462 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Venkatachalam

Respondent

The District Superintendent of Police and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case for the alleged offences punishable under sections 120(b), 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 427 and 380 ipc on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 24.03.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case for the alleged offences punishable under sections 120(b), 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 427 and 380 ipc on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 24.03.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 3. the allegation in the complaint is that the proposed accused persons conspired together, impersonated and created fake documents, as if they are the owners of the property in s.no.447, which belongs to the petitioner. since no action was taken on the complaint lodged by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent, the petitioner is before this court seeking the above relief. 4. in view of the submission made by the learned government advocate (crl.side) that petition enquiry is pending in this case, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the hon'ble apex court in lalitha kumari vs. govt. of u.p and others [2013 (4) crimes 243 (sc). in case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. on receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2^nd respondent to register a case for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 427 and 380 IPC on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 24.03.2016.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2^nd respondent to register a case for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 427 and 380 IPC on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 24.03.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending.

3. The allegation in the complaint is that the proposed accused persons conspired together, impersonated and created fake documents, as if they are the owners of the property in S.No.447, which belongs to the petitioner. Since no action was taken on the complaint lodged by the petitioner before the 2^nd respondent, the petitioner is before this Court seeking the above relief.

4. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that petition enquiry is pending in this case, the 2^nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P and others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Venkatachalam vs The District Superintendent of Police and An... Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Dr. (Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala