M. Moorthy Vs. The Commissioner, Chennai and Others

M. Moorthy vs The Commissioner, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 06, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190751

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190751
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Jun 06, 2016
Case Number: Writ Petition (MD).No. 9749 of 2016 & WM.P.(MD).Nos. 7730 & 7731 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M. Moorthy

Respondent

The Commissioner, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned notification bearing na.ka.no.1790/2016 e2-1 dated 20.05.2016 issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents and quash the same in so far as condition no.9 and 10 relating to the item no.2 in page no.8 of the tender notification.) 1. heard both sides. 2. it is now brought to the notice of this court on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 that the auction relating to the grant of license as regards coconut and fruit sale license and also the special condition nos.9 and 10 were cancelled. in effect, the auction slated on 07.06.2016 is cancelled. 3. in view of the cancellation of auction to be slated on 07.06.2016, this court concludes that nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned notification bearing Na.Ka.No.1790/2016 E2-1 dated 20.05.2016 issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents and quash the same in so far as condition No.9 and 10 relating to the Item No.2 in Page No.8 of the tender notification.)

1. Heard both sides.

2. It is now brought to the notice of this Court on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 that the auction relating to the grant of license as regards coconut and fruit sale license and also the special condition Nos.9 and 10 were cancelled. In effect, the auction slated on 07.06.2016 is cancelled.

3. In view of the cancellation of auction to be slated on 07.06.2016, this Court concludes that nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties M. Moorthy vs The Commissioner, Chennai and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M. Venugopal