Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

G. Maragatham Vs. The HDFC Bank Limited, duly represented by its Authorized Signatory, Madurai

G. Maragatham vs The HDFC Bank Limited, duly represented by its Authorized Signatory, Madurai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 08, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190691

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 3483 of 2010
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G. Maragatham

Respondent

The HDFC Bank Limited, duly represented by its Authorized Signatory, Madurai

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., to call for the entire records relating to stc no.733 of 2009 on the file of the learned judicial magistrate no.ii, madurai and quash the same.) 1. this criminal original petition has been filed, seeking to call for the entire records relating to stc no.733 of 2009 on the file of the learned judicial magistrate no.ii, madurai and quash the same. 2. when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is no more (expired) and therefore, the petition may be dismissed as abated. 3. in view of the above submission, this criminal original petition is dismissed as abated. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records relating to STC No.733 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai and quash the same.)

1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, seeking to call for the entire records relating to STC No.733 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai and quash the same.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is no more (expired) and therefore, the petition may be dismissed as abated.

3. In view of the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as abated. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial