Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

N. Soman and Others Vs. The Commissioner, Kuzhithurai Municipality, Kanyakumari District

N. Soman and Others vs The Commissioner, Kuzhithurai Municipality, Kanyakumari District

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 10, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD)No. 5538 of 2014 & M.P(MD)No. 2 of 2014
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N. Soman and Others

Respondent

The Commissioner, Kuzhithurai Municipality, Kanyakumari District

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioners' representation dated 25.02.2014 requesting to waive the rent for the shops on account of closure of shops due to renovation work in bus stand.) 1. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners himself reports that the writ petition is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. however, this court also has noted that the writ petition is not maintainable as similar prayer sought for in the previous writ petition had already been rejected by this court while dismissing w.p(md)nos.3200 to 3204 and batch of 2012 by order dated 29.08.2012. hence, this writ petition is also dismissed on merits. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioners' representation dated 25.02.2014 requesting to waive the rent for the shops on account of closure of shops due to renovation work in bus stand.)

1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners himself reports that the writ petition is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. However, this Court also has noted that the writ petition is not maintainable as similar prayer sought for in the previous writ petition had already been rejected by this Court while dismissing W.P(MD)Nos.3200 to 3204 and batch of 2012 by order dated 29.08.2012. Hence, this writ petition is also dismissed on merits. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial