Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S. Thibursian Vs. The Chief Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Roads, Chennai and Others

S. Thibursian vs The Chief Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Roads, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 23, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190278

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition No. 16337 of 2015
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Thibursian

Respondent

The Chief Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Roads, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the balance amount of rs.15,96,770/- as per the agreement dr no.3/2010-2011 and c.r.agreement no.10/2013-2014 dated 02.08.2013 in considering the representation dated 05.11.13.)m. venugopal, j. 1. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has given a letter, dated 21.06.2016, to the registry, seeking permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. recording the aforesaid letter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the balance amount of Rs.15,96,770/- as per the agreement DR No.3/2010-2011 and C.R.Agreement No.10/2013-2014 dated 02.08.2013 in considering the representation dated 05.11.13.)

M. Venugopal, J.

1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has given a letter, dated 21.06.2016, to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

2. Recording the aforesaid letter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial