Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shanthi and Others Vs. Munnusamy and Others

Shanthi and Others vs Munnusamy and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 24, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190250

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.M.A.No. 120 of 2000
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shanthi and Others

Respondent

Munnusamy and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: civil miscellanies appeal is filed against the dismissal order dated 23.04.1999 in m.c.o.p.no.158/92 on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal, thiruvallur.) 1. when the matter came up before this court on 24.10.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner. hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 26.10.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. hence, this civil miscellanies appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Miscellanies Appeal is filed against the dismissal order dated 23.04.1999 in M.C.O.P.No.158/92 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Thiruvallur.)

1. When the matter came up before this Court on 24.10.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 26.10.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Miscellanies Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial