U. Prasanth Kumar Vs. The Sub Inspector of Police, Vellore District

U. Prasanth Kumar vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Vellore District

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 04, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190039

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190039
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Jul 04, 2016
Case Number: Crl.OP. No. 13948 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

U. Prasanth Kumar

Respondent

The Sub Inspector of Police, Vellore District

Excerpt

1. it is seen that this petitioner has been arrested by the respondent police for the alleged offences under sections 147, 148, 294[b], 323, 324,506[ii] ipc, r/w 3[1][r] and 3[1][s] of sc and st [prevention of atrocities] amendment ordinance, 2014. since his case has not been taken up on account of boycott of courts, the petitioner is before this court. 2. the hon'ble supreme court has held in harish uppal [ex.capt.] vs union of india reported in [2003] 2 scc 45, that boycott of courts is illegal. therefore, this court cannot pass any orders in violation of the hon'ble supreme court's direction. hence, this petition is closed, with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedies in the manner known to law.

Full Judgment

1. It is seen that this petitioner has been arrested by the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294[b], 323, 324,506[ii] IPC, r/w 3[1][r] and 3[1][s] of SC and ST [Prevention of Atrocities] Amendment Ordinance, 2014. Since his case has not been taken up on account of boycott of Courts, the petitioner is before this Court.

2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in Harish Uppal [Ex.Capt.] Vs Union of India reported in [2003] 2 SCC 45, that boycott of Courts is illegal. Therefore, this Court cannot pass any orders in violation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's direction. Hence, this petition is closed, with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedies in the manner known to law.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2016 Same Parties U. Prasanth Kumar vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Vellore Dis... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge P.N. Prakash