Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Venkatesan Vs. Papaanan and Others

Venkatesan vs Papaanan and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 14, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189866

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.Rc.No. 254 of 2011
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Venkatesan

Respondent

Papaanan and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal revision filed under sections 397 and 401 of criminal procedure code against the judgment dated 05.04.2010 passed in c.c.no.37 of 2009 on the file of judicial magistrate no.ii, hosur, krishnagiri district, acquitting the accused/respondents 1 to 7 herein from the charges under sections 147, 294(b), 323 of ipc.)g. chockalingam, j. 1. learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect, which reads as under: petition filed revision against acquittal instead of appeal against acquittal by mistake. likely may be given to file appeal against acquittal. 2. in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this criminal revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a revision.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code against the judgment dated 05.04.2010 passed in C.C.No.37 of 2009 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur, Krishnagiri District, acquitting the accused/respondents 1 to 7 herein from the charges under sections 147, 294(b), 323 of IPC.)

G. Chockalingam, J.

1. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect, which reads as under:

Petition filed revision against acquittal instead of appeal against acquittal by mistake. Likely may be given to file appeal against acquittal.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a revision.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial