G. Senthil Kumar and Others Vs. Helikx HR Training and Business Consulting LLP, No.33, Chamundi Nagar, Thindal, Erode and Others

G. Senthil Kumar and Others vs Helikx HR Training and Business Consulting LLP, No.33, Chamundi Nagar, Thindal, Erode and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 27, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189553

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1189553
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: C.T. Selvam
Decided On: Jul 27, 2016
Case Number: Civil Revision Petition (PD) No. 2477 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G. Senthil Kumar and Others

Respondent

Helikx HR Training and Business Consulting LLP, No.33, Chamundi Nagar, Thindal, Erode and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: civil revision petition filed under article 227 of the constitution of india against the inaction of the ii additional district court, salem in disposing of i.a.no.66 of 2016 in o.s.no.48 of 2016, on the file of the ii additional district court, salem.) 1. petitioner seeks a direction to learned ii additional district judge, salem, to dispose of i.a.no.66 of 2016 in o.s.no.48 of 2016, within a stipulated time. 2. heard learned counsel for petitioner. 3. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that alleging infringement of trademark, the petitioners/plaintiffs have moved o.s.no.48 of 2016 on the file of the principal district judge, salem, seeking permanent injunction. petitioners/plaintiffs moved in i.a.no.66 of 2016 seeking temporary injunction. though notice was ordered on 19.02.2016, the application was adjourned as many as on 14 occasions for counter and till, date, the application has not been disposed of. 4. considering the submissions made, this court directs the ii additional district judge, salem, to dispose of in i.a.no.66 of 2016, in o.s.no.48 of 2016 as expeditiously as possible in any event, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of this order. 5. the civil revision petition is disposed of with the above direction. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the inaction of the II Additional District Court, Salem in disposing of I.A.No.66 of 2016 in O.S.No.48 of 2016, on the file of the II Additional District Court, Salem.)

1. Petitioner seeks a direction to learned II Additional District Judge, Salem, to dispose of I.A.No.66 of 2016 in O.S.No.48 of 2016, within a stipulated time.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that alleging infringement of trademark, the petitioners/plaintiffs have moved O.S.No.48 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Salem, seeking permanent injunction. Petitioners/Plaintiffs moved in I.A.No.66 of 2016 seeking temporary injunction. Though notice was ordered on 19.02.2016, the application was adjourned as many as on 14 occasions for counter and till, date, the application has not been disposed of.

4. Considering the submissions made, this Court directs the II Additional District Judge, Salem, to dispose of in I.A.No.66 of 2016, in O.S.No.48 of 2016 as expeditiously as possible in any event, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of this order.

5. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2016 Same Parties G. Senthil Kumar and Others vs Helikx HR Training and Busines... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge C.T. Selvam