Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M. Chitra and Others Vs. Selvakumar, The Joint Director, Madurai

M. Chitra and Others vs Selvakumar, The Joint Director, Madurai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jul 29, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189452

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Cont.P.(MD) No. 683 of 2016 in W.P.(MD).No. 22731 of 2015
Subject
Contempt of Court

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contempt of Court

Key legal issue
Contempt of Court

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M. Chitra and Others

Respondent

Selvakumar, The Joint Director, Madurai

Excerpt

(prayer: contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempts court act,1971 to call upon the contemnor/respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this court in w.p.(md).no.22731 of 2015 dated 17.12.2015.) t. raja. j, 1. when the matter is taken-up for hearing, the learned government advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the order under contempt has been complied with, which is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. since the order under contempt is complied with, this contempt petition stands closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempts Court Act,1971 to call upon the contemnor/respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.22731 of 2015 dated 17.12.2015.)

T. Raja. J,

1. When the matter is taken-up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the order under contempt has been complied with, which is not disputed by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners.

2. Since the order under contempt is complied with, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial