S.V. Subbiah Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj and Another

S.V. Subbiah vs The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Aug 01, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189396

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1189396
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: S.S. Sundar
Decided On: Aug 01, 2016
Case Number: Writ Petition(MD)No. 240 of 2010 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2010
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.V. Subbiah

Respondent

The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent issued in proceddings in na.ka.no.m.2/c.,(c)8194/2007, and published in tamil nadu government gazettee no.11, part vi section 2 in no.vi(2)/148/2009, dated 25.03.2009 and confirmed in g.o(d)no.640 rural development and panchayat raj (p.r.iv) department dated 11.11.2009 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently reinstating the petitioner as president of the kurunthampattu panchayat, kallal panchayat union, sivagangai district.) 1. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner reports that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. mr.anwar sameem, who is representing the counsel on record, makes an endorsement to that effect. 2. in view of the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent issued in proceddings in Na.Ka.No.m.2/c.,(C)8194/2007, and published in Tamil Nadu Government Gazettee No.11, Part VI Section 2 in No.VI(2)/148/2009, dated 25.03.2009 and confirmed in G.O(D)No.640 Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (P.R.IV) Department dated 11.11.2009 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently reinstating the petitioner as President of the Kurunthampattu Panchayat, Kallal Panchayat Union, Sivagangai District.)

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner reports that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. Mr.Anwar Sameem, who is representing the counsel on record, makes an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties S.V. Subbiah vs The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural ... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge S.S. Sundar