A. Murugan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Another

A. Murugan vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Aug 23, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1188782

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1188782
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala
Decided On: Aug 23, 2016
Case Number: W.P (MD) No. 13376 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Murugan

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent not to interfere in civil matters to dispose of petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2016.) 1. the writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent not to interfere into the civil matters on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents, who would submit that no such representation is pending with the 2nd respondent. 3. in view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to present a copy of the representation dated 06.04.2016 to the 2nd respondent in person and on receipt of such representation, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2016 and pass appropriate orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. with the above direction, this petition is disposed of. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent not to interfere in Civil Matters to dispose of petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2016.)

1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent not to interfere into the Civil Matters on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, who would submit that no such representation is pending with the 2^nd respondent.

3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to present a copy of the representation dated 06.04.2016 to the 2^nd respondent in person and on receipt of such representation, the 2^nd respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2016 and pass appropriate orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties A. Murugan vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District ... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge The Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala