Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R. Renuga Devi Vs. R. Elangovan

R. Renuga Devi vs R. Elangovan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Aug 31, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1188592

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Cont.P.(MD) No. 994 of 2015 in W.P.(MD).No. 15799 of 2014
Subject
Sales Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contempts Court Act,1971 - Section 11 -

Key legal issue
Sales Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R. Renuga Devi

Respondent

R. Elangovan

Excerpt

contempts court act,1971 - section 11 - (prayer: contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempts court act,1971 to call the respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order dated 22.09.2014 made in w.p.no.15799 of 2014.) 1. none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2. learned government advocate produced a copy of the proceedings dated 29.08.2016 in compliance of the orders passed by this court. 3. in view of the order dated 29.08.2016, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. the contempt petition is closed with the above observation.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempts Court Act,1971 to call the respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order dated 22.09.2014 made in W.P.No.15799 of 2014.)

1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Learned Government Advocate produced a copy of the proceedings dated 29.08.2016 in compliance of the orders passed by this Court.

3. In view of the order dated 29.08.2016, nothing survives for adjudication.

4. The Contempt Petition is closed with the above observation.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial